Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1226-7155(Print)
ISSN : 2287-6618(Online)
International Journal of Oral Biology Vol.40 No.3 pp.135-141
DOI : https://doi.org/10.11620/IJOB.2015.40.3.135

Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Electrolyzed Water Using Various Electrodes against Biofilm of Oral Pathogens

Yun S Yoo2, Hyun-Seung Shin2,3, Sung-Hoon Lee1,2*
1Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
2Dental Research institute, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
3Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
Corresponding Author : Sung-Hoon Lee, Department of Oral Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University, San 29 Anseo-dong, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 330-714 Republic of Korea.Tel.: +82-41-550-1867, Fax: +82-41-550-1859dennisyi@dankook.ac.kr
August 11, 2015 September 1, 2015 September 2, 2015

Abstract

Biofilms of oral microbes can cause various diseases in the oral cavity, such as dental caries, periodontitis and mucosal disease. Electrolyzed water generated by an electric current passed via water using a metal electrode has an antimicrobial effect on pathogenic bacteria which cause food poisoning. This study investigated the antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed waters using various metal electrodes on the floatage and biofilms of oral microbes. The electrolyzed water was generated by passing electric current using copper, silver and platinum electrodes. The electrolyzed water has a neutral pH. Streptococcus mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia were cultured, and were used to form a biofilm using specific media. The floatage and biofilm of the microbes were then treated with the electrolyzed water. The electrolyzed water using platinum electrode (EWP) exhibited strong antimicrobial activity against the floatage and biofilm of the oral microbes. However, the electrolyzed water using copper and silver electrodes had no effect. The EWP disrupted the biofilm oforal microbes, except the S. mutans biofilm. Comparing the different electrolyzed waters that we created the platinum electrode generated water may be an ideal candidate for prevention of dental caries and periodontitis.


초록


    Introduction

    Bacteria in the oral cavity consist of more than 700 bacterial species. In this niche, commensal and pathogenic bacteria co-exist and form biofilms [1]. The Infectious diseases in the oral cavity include dental caries, endodontitis and periodontitis. Dental caries is induced by Streptococcus mutans [2]. Periodontopathogens are classified as a red complex consisting of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola [3]. These pathogenic bacteria form biofilms according to an ordered case sequence [4]. Commensal bacteria bind on teeth and form the initial biofilm. The initial biofilm was developed to mature biofilm by exopolysaccharides as glucans which are secreted from S. mutans. S. mutans is crucial in the formation of cariogenic biofilms by abundant production of acid and glucan. P. gingivalis and T. forsythia also form biofilms with the commensal bacteria through Fusobacterium nucleatum in the gingival pocket [5,6]. The bacteria in biofilm are more complex compared to planktonic bacteria because they are in organized communication with each other and produce specific matrix molecules [4]. Therefore, biofilms are not easily controlled by chemical treatments. The effective bactericidal concentration of antibiotics for biofilm bacteria may be up to 100-1000 fold higher than that of planktonic or floating bacteria [7,8]. Nevertheless, the studies of virulences, antimicrobial agents and characterization about pathogens have conventionally been performed using planktonic bacteria. Control of pathogenic biofilms is essential for maintenance of human health and for prevention of disease.

    Electrolyzed water is generated by an electric current that is passed through water using metal electrodes. Although the detailed mechanisms of electrolyzed water remain elusive, the electrolyzed water has varied characteristics depending on the metal electrodes, which include copper, silver, palladium and gold [9-11]. Electrolyzed water can be acid, basic and neutral. Electrolyzed water has been implicated in anti-cancer effects, oxidative stress and antibacterial activity [12-14]. Acidic electrolyzed water has bactericidal effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [9,12]. Basic electrolyzed water affects oral hygiene including bactericidal activity, biofilm removal and bacterial growth inhibition [15]. Slightly acidic electrolyzed water removes bacterial biofilms on dental unit water systems [16]. However, the antimicrobial effect of electrolyzed water on biofilms of oral microbes has not been studied. This study analyzed and compared the antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed water using various electrodes on biofilms of oral microbes.

    Materials and Methods

    Oral microbes and cultivation

    Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 was cultured using brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586, and Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 were cultivated using BHI broth supplemented with hemin (1 μ g/ml) and vitamin K (0.2 μg/ml) in anaerobic condition (5% H2, 10% CO2 and 85% N2) at 37℃. Tannerella forsythia ATCC 43037 was cultured modified in new oral spirochete (NOS) broth [17] at 37℃ anaerobically.

    Production of various electrolyzed waters

    Tap water (1 L) was subjected to electrolysis for 5 min with 24V of DC 400 mA using copper, silver or platinum electrode (cylindrical, 3 mm x 10 cm) in an whole tank undivided anode chamber and cathode chamber. The DC power supply was PowerPac basic (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). pH level of the electrolyzed water was measured by an Orion 520A pH meter (Thermo Scientific, Beverly, MA, USA) using a pH electrode

    Antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed waters against oral microbes

    S. mutans, P. gingivalis, and T. forsythia were cultivated in each specific medium for 36 h and counted by a Petroff- Hausser bacterial counting chamber (Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA, USA). The bacterial density was adjusted to 1 x 107 cells/ml with BHI broth. One milliliter of each bacterial suspensions was harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 x g for 5 min 4℃ and washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH7.2). The bacterial pellet was treated with 1 ml of electrolyzed water for 30 sec or 1 min, and then immediately added to 1 ml of BHI broth. After diluting serially 10-fold to 106, 50 μl of each diluted suspension was spread on agar plate and incubated at 37℃ anaerobically until colonies could be counted. All procedure of antibacterial assay was performed in anaerobic chamber.

    Biofilm formation of oral microbes

    For biofilm formation of S. mutans, pooled saliva of 10 healthy donors was centrifuged at 9,000 x g for 10 min at 4℃, and then the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. The same volume of PBS was added. After filtration through 0.22 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, the saliva sample was dispensed into 12-well polystyrene plate. The plate was dried at 40℃ and sterilized in an UV sterilizer. S. mutans was inoculated into BHI broth including 1% sucrose and incubated at 37℃ for 48 h anaerobically [2]. To form biofilm of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia, the protein of F. nucleatum was extracted by methanol-chloroform methods after disruption by sonicator (VCS-1300; SONICS, Newtown, CT. USA). The protein was coated on 12-well polystyrene plate. The plate was dried at 40℃ and sterilized using UV. P. gingivalis or T. forsythia were inoculated into BHI broth supplemented with hemin and vitamin K or modified NOS broth, respectively and incubated at 37℃ for 48 h in an anaerobic condition.

    Antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed water against biofilm of oral microbes

    Biofilm was reacted with 2 ml of tap water and electrolyzed water for 30 sec or 1 min and the solution was immediately aspirated by vacuum pump. Biofilm of S. mutans, P. gingivalis and T. forsythia received 1 ml of unsupplemented BHI broth or BHI broth supplemented with hemin and vitamin K and modified NOS broth, respectively. Biofilms were mechanically disrupted with a scraper and transferred into a new 1.5 ml tube. The tubes were vortexed for 30 s (in case of S. mutans, glass beads were added in the tube). The biofilm suspensions were serially diluted from 10 to 108 with each specific medium. Fifty microliters of diluted biofilm suspension was spread on BHI agar, BHI agar supplemented with hemin and vitamin K, and modified NOS agar using triangle spreader, respectively. The bacteria were incubated at 37℃ for 72 h in an anaerobic condition. Colony forming units of each bacterium were counted.

    Comparison of biofilm biomass and viable bacteria

    Bacterial biofilms were treated with electrolyzed water and washed twice with PBS to remove planktonic bacteria. Each biofilm was stained with crystal violet and washed three times with PBS. Acetone-alcohol (10:90) solution was added and, the optical density of the supernatant was measured at a wavelength 590 nm by spectrophotometer to determine the biofilm biomass. To detect viable bacteria, electrolyzed water-treated S. mutans biofilms were observed by LSM 5 Pascal confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl-Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using Z-stack scan from 0 to 30 after bacterial live/dead staining using LIVE/DEAD® BacLightTM kit (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). Briefly, live bacteria are stained by binding SYTO 9 on the bacterial membrane, and dead bacteria are stained by binding of propidium iodide (PI) to nucleic acid. SYTO 9 and PI fluoresce green and red, respectively. Image was visualized using Zeiss image program (Carl-Zeiss).

    Statistical analysis

    Differences between control and samples were analyzed by Krusical-wallis and Mann-Whitney test using SPSS 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    Results

    Antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed water against oral microbes

    The typical pathogens of 3 species related with oral diseases such as caries, gingivitis and periodontitis were selected to investigate antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed water. When planktonic pathogens were treated with various electrolyzed water for 30 sec or 1 min, the electrolyzed water using platinum electrode (EWP) exhibited antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, P. gingivalis and T. forsythia (Fig. 1). The electrolyzed water using copper electrode (EWC) and silver electrode (EWS) did not affect oral microbes.

    Antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed water against biofilms of oral microbes

    Oral pathogens form biofilm in oral cavity and express specific genes related with resistance against antimicrobial agents via bacterial communication [8]. Therefore, after the bacteria were formed biofilm, the electrolyzed water was evaluated antimicrobial activity against the biofilm of oral microbes. Among the electrolyzed water, EWP showed strong antimicrobial activity against the biofilm of oral microbes (Fig. 2). The viability of S. mutans biofilm was decreased in treating with EWP for 1 min (Fig. 2A). Also, the viable count of P. gingivalis biofilm was slightly reduced by 1 min treatment with the EWS, and 30 sec or 1 min treatment with EWP. In case of T. forsythia biofilm, 30 sec or 1 min treatment with the EWP decreased the bacterial viability, as did not treatment with EWC and EWS (Fig. 2C).

    Disruptive effect of the electrolyzed water on biofilm of oral microbes

    The antimicrobial efficiency of the electrolyzed waters differed between biofilm and planktonic bacteria. Especially, EWP showed greater antimicrobial efficiency against biofilms than planktonic microbes for P. gingivalis and T. forsythia (Figs. 1B, 1C, 2B, and 2C). After treatment with the electrolyzed water, biofilm biomass was investigated. The EWC and the EWS did not disrupt T. forsythia biofilm (Fig. 3C), while EWP significantly reduced the biomass of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia biofilms (Figs. 3B and C). However, none of the electrolyzed waters disrupted S. mutans biofilm (Fig. 3A).

    Antimicrobial activity of the electrolyzed water using platinum electrode against S. mutans biofilm.

    EWP showed antibacterial activity against planktonic S. mutans but did not disrupt S. mutans biofilms. Bacteria in biofilm are phenotypically heterogeneous, unlike fungi. Therefore, the antibacterial activity of EWP was investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy after bacterial live/dead staining. S. mutans biofilms were treated with tap water as control fluoresced green (Fig. 4A). When S. mutans biofilms were treated with EWP for various times, they tended to fluoresce mostly green with some yellow in treating EWP for 30 sec (Fig. 4B), and green, yellow and red color in 1 min treatment with EWP (Fig. 4C). Especially, the red fluorescence tended to be in the interior of biofilms, indicating that the antibacterial activity of EWP affected the interior of S. mutans biofilm (Fig. 4C).

    Discussion

    Oral microbes exist in planktonic and biofilm forms in oral cavity. Biofilms as dental plaque are associated with oral disease [2,4,8]. Etiologically, P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and T. denticola are closely associated with acute and chronic periodontitis [3]. Since S. mutans is an acidogenic and aciduric bacteria, they are considered as cariogenic bacteria [2]. For these reasons, the management of oral biofilm is important for prevention of oral disease and has been studied by various groups [2,18]. Electrolyzed water is water through which an electric current is passed using a metal electrode. This process alters physicochemical properties of the water [19]. Electrolyzed water has antibacterial activity against food [10]. Most electrolyzed water is usually generated by electrolysis of solution including a little sodium chloride in reparative chamber between the cathode and anode [10]. Since electrolyzed water is acidic or basic, its bactericidal effect has been tried to apply for food and equipment [19,20]. In this study, neutral pH electrolyzed water was generated using copper, silver, and platinum electrodes with relatively high conductivity in an unseparated chamber.

    When the antimicrobial activity of the three types of electrolyzed water against planktonic oral microbes was examined, the EWP exhibited to have relatively strong antimicrobial activity. Some studies were suggested that the bactericidal effect of electrolyzed water has been correlated with free chlorine [21,22]. However, the EWP used in this study did not contain detectable free chlorine (data not shown). Therefore, the antimicrobial effect of electrolyzed water might be also involved other molecules, such as dissolved hydrogen and oxygen radicals, as well as free chlorine. The chemical reaction is H2O →1/2 O2 +2H+ + 2e-, 2Cl- → Cl2 +2e- and Cl2+H2O ↔ HClO + HCl at the anode, and H2O + 2e- → 1/2H2 + OH- at the cathode. However the electrolyzed water in this study had neutral pH. High conductivity of a palladium electrode compared to copper and silver electrodes may produce oxygen radicals (O2-), and reactive hydrogen (H) on the basis of high concentration of dissolved hydrogen. These ions may destroy the bacterial wall by binding surface components, and inhibit cytoplasmic signaling by irregular aggregation of cytoplasmic molecules. Transmission electron microscopy of bacterial morphology after treatment with electrolyzed water has revealed cell wall damage and irregular aggregation of cytoplasmic small granules compared to non-treated bacteria [23].

    The antimicrobial effect of electrolyzed waters on biofilms of the same oral pathogens was investigated, since biofilms are classically more resistant to antibiotics [8]. The EWP had an antimicrobial effect on biofilm of oral microbes such as S. mutans, P. gingivalis and T. forsythia biofilms. Unexpectedly, the antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed water for biofilm of oral microbes was only slightly higher level or similar to the planktonic counterparts. As noted above, the biofilm is more resistant to antibiotics molecules than planktonic microbes. Therefore, the disruptive effect of electrolyzed water on biofilms was evaluated. Biomass of biofilms can be measured by staining with crystal violet. Of the electrolyzed waters, only the EWP changed biofilm biomass. The EWP decreased the biomass of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia biofilm. These results indicate that the EWP has antimicrobial activity against S. mutans and both antimicrobial and disruptive effect on P. gingivalis and T. forsythia. S. mutans, unlike P. gingivalis and T. forsythia, produces exopolysaccharide as glucan [24]. S. mutans can synthesize both water-soluble and -insoluble glucan using glucosyltransferase [2]. Glucans assist in the attachment and colonization of bacteria, and are important in the formation and development of biofilms [25]. Also, glucans are a protective barrier of biofilms and protect oral bacteria by inhibiting diffusion of antibiotics into biofilms [8]. The lack of S. mutans biofilm disruption by the EWP may reflect the presence of the exopolysaccharide. Thus, the antimicrobial activity of the EWP against S. mutans biofilm was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy after fluorescence staining for live and dead bacteria. The EWP had bactericidal effect on interior of S. mutans biofilm. Bacteria in biofilms are physiologically heterogeneous, with bacteria in the interior and on the surface being metabolically inert and active, respectively [26]. The EWP may affect S. mutans in stationary state.

    The present study demonstrates the antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed water against biofilm and planktonic oral pathogens. The EWP showed the highest level of antimicrobial activity against oral pathogens in the both conditions. The neutral electrolyzed water has the merit of easy and safe application for humans than chemical solutions; safety for human in drinking up to at least 1.2 L/day has been reported [27].

    Electrolyzed water generated using a palladium electrode may have potential value as a gargle solution for prevention of oral diseases induce by pathogens and denture-related stomatitis.

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

    Figure

    IJOB-40-135_F1.gif
    Antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed water against planktonic oral pathogens

    Oral microbes were cultivated by using specific medium for 36 h and adjusted to a density of 1 x 107 bacteria/ml. One milliliter of each suspension was harvested by centrifugation. After removing supernatant, the microbial pellets were treated with each medium (control), tap water, and electrolyzed waters for 30 sec or 1 min. The microbes were plated on agar, and colony forming units (CFU) were determined. The examinations were carried out in duplicate in three independent experiments. * Significantly different compared with control (p<0.05).

    IJOB-40-135_F2.gif
    Antimicrobial activity of electrolyzed water against biofilms of oral pathogens

    After forming biofilm of oral microbes in 12-well plate, the plate was washed twice with PBS to remove planktonic microbes and treated with each medium (control), tap water and the electrolyzed water generated using copper (EWC), silver (EWS) and platinum electrode (EWP) for 30 sec or 1 min. After removing the electrolyzed water, biofilm was added to 1 ml of the appropriate specific medium and mechanically disrupted. The re-suspended microbes were plated on agar and incubated. Colony numbers were determined. The examinations were carried out in duplicate in three independent experiments. * Significantly different compared with control (p<0.05).

    IJOB-40-135_F3.gif
    Effect of electrolyzed water on biofilm biomass

    Biofilm of oral microbes were formed using the appropriate medium in wells of 12-well plate. The plate was washed twice with PBS to remove planktonic microbes and treated with each medium (control), tap water and the electrolyzed water using copper, silver and platinum electrode for 30 sec or 1 min. After removing the electrolyzed water, biofilms were stained with crystal violet and de-stained with acetone-alcohol solution. Each supernatant was transferred into wells of 96-well plates and optical density was measured at a wavelength 590 nm by spectrophotometer. The examinations were performed in duplicate in three independent experiments. * Significant different compared with control (p<0.05).

    IJOB-40-135_F4.gif
    Representative image of S. mutans biofilm after treatment with electrolyzed water generated using a platinum electrode

    S. mutans biofilms were formed using BHI broth including sucrose for 48 h. The biofilms were treated with electrolyzed water using platinum electrode for 30 sec or 1 min. After washing with PBS, the biofilm was stained with live/dead bacterial staining kit. The biofilm was analyzed using Z-stack scan by confocal laser scanning microscope. The images were visualized by Zeiss image program. Green fluorescence and red fluorescence in images indicated live and dead S. mutans, respectively.

    Table

    Reference

    1. Kuramitsu HK , He X , Lux R , Anderson MH , Shi W (2007) Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities , Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, Vol.71; pp.653-670
    2. Lee SH , Choi BK , Kim YJ (2012) The cariogenic characters of Efficacy of electrolyzed water on oral biofilms 141 xylitol-resistant and xylitol-sensitive Streptococcus mutans in biofilm formation with salivary bacteria , Arch Oral Biol, Vol.57; pp.697-703
    3. Socransky SS , Haffajee AD , Cugini MA , Smith C , Kent RL (1998) Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque , J Clin Periodontol, Vol.25; pp.134-144
    4. Marsh PD (2004) Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm , Caries Res, Vol.38; pp.204-211
    5. Lee SH , Baek DH (2013) Characteristics of Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide in co-culture with Fusobacterium nucleatum , Mol Oral Microbiol, Vol.28; pp.230-238
    6. Jang YJ , Choi YJ , Lee SH , Jun HK , Choi BK (2013) Autoinducer 2 of Fusobacterium nucleatum as a target molecule to inhibit biofilm formation of periodontopathogens , Arch Oral Biol, Vol.58; pp.17-27
    7. Hoiby N , Bjarnsholt T , Givskov M , Molin S , Ciofu O (2010) Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms , Int J Antimicrob Agents, Vol.35; pp.322-332
    8. Socransky SS , Haffajee AD (2002) Dental biofilms difficult therapeutic targets , Periodontol, Vol.28; pp.12-55
    9. Sun JL , Zhang SK , Chen JY , Han BZ (2012) Efficacy of acidic and basic electrolyzed water in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm , Can J microbiol, Vol.58; pp.448-454
    10. Hricova D , Stephan R , Zweifel C (2008) Electrolyzed water and its application in the food industry , J Food Prot, Vol.71; pp.1934,-1947,
    11. Kitamura T , Todo H , Sugibayashi K (2009) Effect of several electrolyzed waters on the skin permeation of lidocaine, benzoic Acid, and isosorbide mononitrate , Drug Dev Ind Pharm, Vol.35; pp.145-153
    12. Pangloli P , Hung YC (2011) Efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water in killing or reducing Escherichia coli O157: H7 on iceberg lettuce and tomatoes under simulated food service operation conditions , J Food Sci, Vol.76; pp.M361-366
    13. Ye J , Li Y , Hamasaki T , Nakamichi N , Komatsu T , Kashiwagi T , Teruya K , Nishikawa R , Kawahara T , Osada K , Toh K , Abe M , Tian H , Kabayama S , Otsubo K , Morisawa S , Katakura Y , Shirahata S (2008) Inhibitory effect of electrolyzed reduced water on tumor angiogenesis , Biol Pharm Bull, Vol.31; pp.19-26
    14. Park SK (2013) Electrolyzed-reduced water increases resistance to oxidative stress, fertility, and lifespan via insulin/IGF-1-like signal in C. elegans , Biol Res, Vol.46; pp.147-152
    15. Lee SH , Choi BK (2006) Antibacterial effect of electrolyzed water on oral bacteria , J Microbiol, Vol.44; pp.417-422
    16. Komachiya M , Yamaguchi A , Hirai K , Kikuchi Y , Mizoue S , Takeda N , Ito M , Kato T , Ishihara K , Yamashita S , Akihiro K (2014) Antiseptic effect of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on dental unit water systems , Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, Vol.55; pp.77-86
    17. Lee SH , Jun HK , Lee HR , chung CP , Choi BK (2010) Antibacterial and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-neutralising activity of human cationic antimicrobial peptides against periodontopathogens , Int J Antimicrob Agents, Vol.35; pp.138-145
    18. Mah TF , O'Toole GA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents , Trends Microbiol, Vol.9; pp.34-39
    19. Rahman SM , Park J , Song KB , Al-Harbi NA , Oh DH (2012) Effects of slightly acidic low concentration electrolyzed water on microbiological, physicochemical, and sensory quality of fresh chicken breast meat , J Food Sci, Vol.77; pp.M35-41
    20. Lee KJ , Jin D , Chang BS , Teng YC , Kim DH (2009) The immunological effects of electrolyzed reduced water on the Echinostoma hortense infection in C57BL/6 mice , Biol Pharm Bull, Vol.32; pp.456-462
    21. Osafune T , Ehara T , Ito T (2006) Electron microscopic studies on bactericidal effects of electrolyzed acidic water on bacteria derived from kendo protective equipment , Environ Health Prev Med, Vol.11; pp.206-214
    22. Kim C , Hung YC (2012) Inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 on blueberries by electrolyzed water, ultraviolet light, and ozone , J Food Sci, Vol.77; pp.M206-211
    23. Nakajima N , Nakano T , Harada F , Taniguchi H , Yokoyama I , Hirose J , Daikoku E , Sano K (2004) Evaluation of disinfective potential of reactivated free chlorine in pooled tap water by electrolysis , J Microbiol Methods, Vol.57; pp.163-173
    24. Nan S , Yongyu LI , Baoming LI , Wang C , Cui X , Cao W (2010) Effect of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for inactivating Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Staphylococcus aureus analyzed by transmission electron microscopy , J Food Prot, Vol.73; pp.2211-2216
    25. Monchois V , Willemot RM , Monsan P (1999) Glucansucrases mechanism of action and structure-function relationships , FEMS Microbiol Rev, Vol.23; pp.131-151
    26. Kreth J , Zhu L , Merritt J , Shi W , Qi F (2008) Role of sucrose in the fitness of Streptococcus mutans , Oral Microbiol Immunol, Vol.23; pp.213-219
    27. Stewart PS , Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms , Nat Rev Microbiol, Vol.6; pp.199-210
    28. Saitoh Y , Harata Y , Mizuhashi F , Nakajima M , Miwa N (2010) Biological safety of neutral-pH hydrogen-enriched electrolyzed water upon mutagenicity, genotoxicity and subchronic oral toxicity , Toxicol Ind Health, Vol.26; pp.203-216